ads
Edition: United States
language: English
ads
ads
AMI Settles Lawsuit With Mcdougal Over Lifetime Rights Dispute

AMI Settles Lawsuit With Mcdougal Over Lifetime Rights Dispute

Politics Desk 25 Apr , 2024 06:54 PM GMT

  • American Media Inc. settled lawsuit with Karen McDougal regarding her lifetime rights.

  • David Pecker, CEO of AMI, wanted to extend McDougal's contract to prevent negative statements.

  • Pecker confirmed McDougal filed a lawsuit to regain her lifetime rights.

AMI Settles Lawsuit With Mcdougal Over Lifetime Rights Dispute
Karen Mcdougal in black
IMDB
ads

In a recent development, it has been revealed that American Media Inc. (AMI), the parent company of the National Enquirer, settled a lawsuit with former Playboy model Karen McDougal regarding her lifetime rights.

The settlement came after David Pecker, the CEO of AMI, expressed his desire to extend McDougal's contract to prevent her from making any negative statements about AMI or President Trump. Pecker confirmed that McDougal had filed a lawsuit against AMI in order to regain her lifetime rights.

ads

During the negotiations, Pecker mentioned that President Trump was initially skeptical of the idea but eventually stated, 'It’s your business, you should do whatever you plan on doing.' Despite Trump's reservations, the lawsuit was settled amicably, and AMI returned McDougal's lifetime rights to her.

David Pecker, CEO of AMI, wanted to extend McDougal's contract to prevent negative statements.

American Media Inc. settled lawsuit with Karen McDougal regarding her lifetime rights.

Pecker confirmed McDougal filed a lawsuit to regain her lifetime rights.

This settlement marks the conclusion of a legal dispute that had been ongoing between McDougal and AMI. The details of the settlement have not been disclosed publicly, but it is clear that both parties have reached a resolution that satisfies their respective interests.

ads

McDougal's lawsuit against AMI and the subsequent settlement highlight the complexities of legal battles involving high-profile individuals and media organizations. The case serves as a reminder of the importance of protecting intellectual property rights and contractual agreements in the entertainment industry.

End of Article

No COMMENT ON THIS STORY
ads
ads

Next Story