ads
Edition: United States
language: English
ads
ads
Former Chief of Staff predicts Supreme Court ruling against executive privilege

Former Chief of Staff predicts Supreme Court ruling against executive privilege

Politics Desk 21 Dec , 2023 01:10 PM GMT

  • Trump team using dilatory tactic to push cases after election.

  • VP and Mark maintain it should be up to American voters.

  • Jack Smith case in Colorado wants to delay till after election.

Former Chief of Staff predicts Supreme Court ruling against executive privilege
Donald Trump Organization trial in New York State Supreme Court in New York
Reuters
ads

In a recent interview, Mark Short, former Chief of Staff to Vice President Mike Pence, offered his perspective on the ongoing legal battles surrounding the Trump team's efforts to delay certain cases until after the election. Short maintained that these cases should ultimately be left to the American voters to decide.

Regarding a specific case in Colorado, Short acknowledged the Trump team's desire to postpone it until after the election, a move that could potentially allow for the appointment of a new team at the Department of Justice if President Trump is reelected. However, Short drew attention to a historical parallel in the Watergate case from 50 years ago.

ads

Short highlighted a crucial ruling by the Supreme Court in the Watergate case, where it was determined that executive privilege does not provide blanket immunity. He pointed out that this ruling came just two months after a district court's initial decision. Short argued that this precedent could be applied to the current situation, leading to a denial of claims that executive privilege shields individuals from potential criminal activity.

Twitter Post On Former Chief of Staff predicts Supreme Court ruling against executive privilege

When asked if he personally wants the Supreme Court to follow this precedent, Short stated that it was not a matter of his personal preference, but rather a consideration of the legal course of action. He stressed that the current process is proceeding as it should and that the Supreme Court has a precedent to review in making their decision.

ads

The interview shed light on the Trump team's strategy of delaying certain cases and raised questions about the application of executive privilege in these situations. Short's reference to the Watergate case serves as a reminder that the judiciary has historically taken a balanced approach to executive privilege claims, demonstrating that the concept does not grant outright immunity to those involved.

As these legal battles continue to unfold, the American public remains divided on the best path forward. With the election just around the corner, the decision on these cases may ultimately rest in the hands of voters, as emphasized by Short throughout the interview. The coming weeks are sure to be filled with legal and political drama as the nation eagerly awaits the outcomes and their potential ramifications.

End of Article

No COMMENT ON THIS STORY
ads
ads

Next Story