K-File reveals secret Twitter account of right-wing attorney in election subversion.
Attorney failed to disclose account during interviews with Michigan prosecutors.
Tweets suggest a strategy to convince Republican legislatures of election rigging.
New exclusive reporting from K-File reveals that a secret Twitter account belonging to a right-wing attorney involved in the Trump campaign's fake electors plot has been uncovered. The attorney, who pleaded guilty in the Georgia election subversion case and cooperated with prosecutors in multiple states, concealed this account from authorities. The discovery is significant as it indicates a more aggressive election subversion strategy than previously disclosed.
The attorney failed to disclose the account during interviews with Michigan prosecutors, despite evidence of tweets promoting a strategy contradicting his statements. The tweets suggest a plan to convince Republican legislatures of election rigging, bypassing the need for court rulings, contrary to his earlier claims.
Legal experts suggest that this revelation could increase the attorney's legal jeopardy, prompting the Michigan attorney general to express interest in investigating the matter further. While the attorney's legal team confirmed the account's ownership and acknowledged inconsistencies, they emphasized a distinction between the attorney's professional advice and his online persona.
The attorney's attorneys stated that during his campaign work, he provided legitimate legal advice, while his online persona, Badger Pundit, was characterized as a separate entity. The attorney's cooperation with investigators to address the discrepancies has been highlighted, with ongoing scrutiny from authorities in light of the new information.
The attorney's actions raise questions about transparency and truthfulness in legal proceedings, underscoring the complexities of navigating legal challenges and online personas. The evolving investigation underscores the importance of full disclosure and accountability in legal matters, particularly in cases involving election integrity and subversion.
End of Article