ads
Edition: United States
language: English
ads
ads
Election Interference Case In Georgia Unraveling For Prosecutors

Election Interference Case In Georgia Unraveling For Prosecutors

Politics Desk 27 Feb , 2024 11:46 AM GMT

  • Testimony in election interference case in Georgia involving former President Trump.

  • Judge scrutinizing relationship between Fannie Willis and prosecutor Nathan Wade.

  • Former divorce attorney Terrence Bradley ordered to testify in the case.

Election Interference Case In Georgia Unraveling For Prosecutors
Fulton County special prosecutor Nathan Wade looks on during a hearing on the Georgia election interference case, Tuesday, Feb. 13, 2024, in Atlanta, (Alyssa Pointer/Pool Photo via AP)
AP
ads

Today in Georgia, testimony in the election interference case involving former President Donald Trump is set to potentially disqualify a key figure, Fannie Willis, due to her relationship with a prosecutor she hired. The judge has ordered Terrence Bradley, a former divorce attorney for one of the involved parties, to testify. Concerns have been raised about the extensive communication between Willis and Nathan Wade, as evidenced by cell phone records showing thousands of interactions in 2021.

The judge's scrutiny extends to the nature of Bradley's testimony, given his dual role as a former partner and attorney for Wade. The judge sought to ensure that Bradley could provide testimony as a witness rather than in a legal capacity. Despite initial challenges from Willis' team to certain lines of questioning, the judge appears satisfied with Bradley's ability to testify independently.

ads

Judge scrutinizing relationship between Fannie Willis and prosecutor Nathan Wade.

Testimony in election interference case in Georgia involving former President Trump.

Former divorce attorney Terrence Bradley ordered to testify in the case.

The case against Willis and Wade appears to be unraveling, with contradictions emerging in their testimonies. Wade, in particular, faces allegations of providing conflicting statements under oath, raising concerns of potential perjury. The implications are significant, as both individuals are involved in prosecuting others for similar offenses.

ads

The focus has shifted from the original allegations to the mounting legal troubles facing Willis and Wade. Accusations of perjury and filing false statements could lead to personal charges and professional repercussions, including potential disciplinary action by the bar association. The gravity of the situation underscores the high stakes involved, as unanswered questions continue to loom over the case.

End of Article

No COMMENT ON THIS STORY
ads
ads

Next Story